- The year was 2017. The number one song on the Billboard 100 was Slide by Calvin Harris. The best picture that year was Moonlight. The bad orange man was sworn in to office. And Google (don’t be evil) released the Pixel 2. That was a different decade and I was determined not to get sucked into the iPhone cult, so I switched from my crank operated flip phone to the Pixel. Actually, my only reason for going with the Google phone was the camera. I’m all about the Instagram selfies. I’ve been pretty happy with it (the phone, not the selfies). I’ve had zero issues other than a loose USB-C port that’s been the source of some charging and connectivity problems. But, technology marches on and it’s time to upgrade. Well, I don’t want to upgrade but I have to solve the navigation problems with the ginormous motorcycle and this is step one. So which phone? I pulled up a comparison list of specs for the top sellers and after 30 seconds my eyes glazed over. I don’t care about specs. I’m not in the corporate world any more, so I’m not trying to do Zoom meetings on my mobile. I only do a few things with my phone. I send text messages so I don’t have to actually speak to humans. I take pictures. I attempt to use navigation/maps. I look up random facts on the internet while waiting for the coffee to brew. Oh, and once every month or so I actually make a phone call. That’s it. I don’t need a 1.21 Jiggawatt processor to send text messages. So, which phone to buy? Between the latest Samsung, Pixel, and iPhone models the cameras seem roughly equal. I’m not taking pics for museum quality prints… I don’t need an f 1.7, wide angle, super view, dark mode, lidar enhanced, espresso capable, quad lens. I take pictures of the dog for Instagram (he’s very popular). Mrs Troutdog is a faithful citizen of the Apple ecosystem and has been putting out some heavy pressure to switch over. I wouldn’t necessarily be opposed, but I’m a Microsoft guy and I’m just not ready to switch to iCloud to try and get cross-device syncing to work. So it’s between the Samsung s21 and the Pixel 5. Samsung’s camera is probably a touch better, but I’m not a fan of how they over sharpen their images. I’d rather ruin images by over saturating them myself. Besides, I’d have to sell off some Bitcoin to afford the latest Samsung. Looks like I’m staying with team Pixel. I’m heading to the store this afternoon so stay tuned. I’m extremely gullible and susceptible to salespeople, so who knows what I’ll actually come home with. I might be sporting a fancy new Xiaomi Redmi, featuring background data sync with China’s office of state telecom security cloud service. Free cloud storage!
- If you haven’t been following along, the Chauvin trial doesn’t appear to be going well for the state. The possibility of a finding other than murder is looking more likely. And as I’ve said before, Minneapolis will burn if that happens. I wouldn’t schedule a vacation trip to catch a Minnesota Twins game anytime soon.
- 60 Minutes was once the pillar of investigative journalism. After their hit piece on Florida gov DeSantis, it’ll be hard to trust anything they publish moving forward. If you haven’t seen it, here’s what 60 Minutes aired vs what his full answer to the question was. I don’t care if you like the governor or not, you can’t watch that and still say it was unbiased reporting.
- A baby elephant trying to be fierce. Because who doesn’t like baby elephants?
- Today is the official end of winter. Well, for me. I had fully intended to get a couple of last days of skiing in this week before the resort and ski trails close this weekend. Life got in the way and I’m not able to go. So that’s it. Done. Winter 20/21 is over. Now starts the countdown to full snow melt and summer activities. Around these parts it’s known as “mud season”. I’m not a fan. Guess I’ll just have to ride the motorcycle for the next month.
Song of the day: Bush – Swallowed – 7/23/1999 – Woodstock 99 East Stage
3 thoughts on “Give Me A Call”
Been awhile since I’ve entertained the readership with my witty and inciteful commentary.
Sending texts so you don’t actually have to talk to humans. I know right!
And agreed. Cool dog photos.
Yeah, but. It’s interesting how the trial can be “spun” depending on which “expert witness” testimony is reported on.
If I was a conspiracy nut, I’d claim mainstream media is selectively reporting the testimony to set an expectation of a guilty verdict to inspire more outrage when one doesn’t come down. The reporting on the general sacking and rampage in all major metropolitan centers across the lower ’48 will sell beaucoup advertising time.
But agreed. Minneapolis is a no go list.
“once the pillar of investigative journalism” ?? Since when? The ambush interview has been part and parcel to their MO since day one. And if the facts don’t align, make’em up. How do I know when they start shading the truth to sell advertising time? Easy. As soon as the show starts!
Fast forward to the end of the article. “Controversies”. The hard hitting 86 piece. Unintended acceleration. To start. ” It later emerged that an expert witness employed by one of the plaintiffs modified the accelerator with a concealed device, causing the “unintended acceleration””
I don’t think it’s a conspiracy. The media will full on shape their coverage of this for maximum outrage.
Ok, maybe I was stretching it with “pillar of investigative journalism” LOL